Archive for the 'Remote Viewing' Category

Apr 16 2010

Profile Image of admin
admin

Real Time

Filed under Remote Viewing

I don’t think we need to resort to quantum mathematics to talk about time. There’s only a handful of people on the planet that really understand that language. There are simpler mathematics that illustrate the illusion of time, and those are hard enough to understand.

Time is an idea. It’s real world referents are never as error free as the ideal mental construct. It is made up of a combination of memory and repetitive movements in space. Time is like a melody that can only exist as one note in any given instant. Memory provides the sense of continuity that we can recognize as a tune.

Time is mathematically defined by its units of measurement. There are a variety of references for time but in the real world none of them are as exact as the idea of time. Seconds, days, months years are defined by movements of planetary objects in space, but seconds don’t fit perfectly into years. There is accumulative error that has to be adjusted for with leap years and so on. So there has been a search for more exact references. They have come up with atomic clocks that oscillate at very steady frequencies. So time is now based on repetitive movements of atoms through space instead of planets. That serves to reduce the error factor to parts per million levels which is more than tolerable — but it is still in error compared to the idea of time.

The only thing real is the eternal now. The rest is an idea. Unreal mathematical ideas are useful sometimes. If 2 times itself yeilds 4 and 1 times itself yeilds 1, what number times itself yeilds -1? The square root of -1 does not exist. If you try it on a calculator you will get an error. But if you ignore its non-existence and put it into trigonometry equations you end up with a tool for describing electricity. Alternating current is a periodic motion, cycles in time. Imaginary numbers can describe the timing relationship between current and voltage cycles.

No one has trouble admitting that square-roots of negative numbers are useful mathematical fictions. Math is a tricky language. Time is also just an idea, but it is so built into our every-day language that it looks as solid as a rock.

So what about pre-cognitive viewing? Most of the viewers at TKR have seen that time anomally, first hand. How do we handle anomalies? By explaining them with the most impressive scientific language we can muster? (analytical overlay). Or do we hold them loosely like an impressionistic painter rendering a sunset?

No responses yet

Nov 09 2008

Profile Image of admin
admin

Starting Out

Filed under Remote Viewing

When I first looked into remote viewing I was excited to see that there was a how-to manual (the CRV manual). I was quickly disappointed to find that it was mostly an external method of data recording that offered only a limited insight into the internal processes of viewing. There were courses available but they seemed expensive and they were all based on CRV as the data collecting model. I was hoping for more of a do-it-yourself yoga sutra for the Western world.

“The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali” is a very old Sanskrit text which is a highly condensed operating manual for learning supernormal powers. In fact, in one edition of it that I have, the subtitle of Book III is “Supernormal powers”. As I said it is very condensed, perhaps like a course syllabus for advanced yoga teachers. It wasn’t quite a do-it-yourself manual either. Also, the sutras use words like dhyana, dharana, samadhi and samyama that lose a lot in translation, thus the desire for a take on the subject that was more native to the Western/modern world.

I forgot about remote viewing for a while. Later I came back to it when I found the Ten Thousand Roads practice gallery and the forum. I was encouraged to try the “Just do it” method. My previous experience in meditation proved to be helpful in shifting into the right mind-state, and I found that “Just do it” was the only instruction I needed.

After a while I came across something that I could think of as a yoga sutra for the west. In a topic on the TKR forum about RV Tips, “Banded_Krait” recommended reading chapter 21 of “Mental Radio” by Upton Sinclair. That chapter was written by Sinclair’s wife, Mary Craig. It provides a very insightful description of the skills and inner processes involved. This husband and wife team were interested in investigating telepathy and structured their experiments accordingly. Remote viewers will recognized the similarity between these sessions and an RV session. Mary Craig notes that her insights apply to both telepathy and clairvoyance. Remote viewing would involve the same inner skills within a double-blind protocol.

The Sinclair-Craig experiments reflect the telepathy experiments of the early 20th century. They used sketches as targets, with the goal of having the percipient (the viewer) recreate the sketch. In RV, a target may also be represented in words, photos, or geo coordinates. A viewer will express their impressions in any medium they are fluent in, words being very common.

Mary Craig’s chapter has many personal observations of the interactions of subconscious-mind, conscious-mind and deep-mind that the remote viewer will often find to be relevant to their own experience. She describes what might be called an ERV method (extended remote viewing)  which has less external structure than CRV.

From Patanjali, we know that the core skill of remote viewing is the result of samyama applied to the light of higher perception. If you want to know about the state of samyama and higher perception, Mary Craig’s insights are a clear commentary.

No responses yet

Oct 26 2008

Profile Image of admin
admin

Tlon, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius

Filed under Remote Viewing

In the 1930’s the Argentine author, Jorge Luis Borges, wrote a short story called “Tlon, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius”. Within the story there is an encyclopedia of an imaginary planet called Tlon. The encyclopedia contains numerous facts about this land twice removed from ordinary reality. The following points might have a ring of familiarity to the remote-viewer.

In Tlon there are no nouns. Instead there are strings of adjectives. In place of Moon, for instance, one might say “airy-clear over dark-round”. The universe of Tlon is considered to be made up of a series of events or states-of-mind. Giving such an event a name would be to falsify it. The association of a name with the thing named would be an association of two distinct non-reducable states-of-mind.

To explain or judge an event is to identify or unite it with another one. In Tlon, such connection is a later stage in the mind of the observer, which can in no way affect or illuminate the earlier stage.

The story goes on to unfold the implications of these ideas in the culture of Tlon and how the invention of Tlon was the act of a secret society.

The remote-viewer might recognize the falsification that comes with naming things rather than sticking to descriptive terms. In naming things, one thing leads to another as the active mind happily trots out into left-field away from the intended target. The active mind loves to play word association, and as much fun as that is, it seldom has to do with the intended target. It is always best to describe things rather than name them. When nouns are encountered think of them as poetic analogs.

Metaphysicians of Tlon are not looking for truth, nor even for an approximation of it; they are after a kind of amazement

Wonder serves better than judgement during a session.

No responses yet